Is that “science” just explains away the parts they don’t understand , as “junk DNA” 😂😂😂
Junk DNA
Our genetic manual holds the instructions for the proteins that make up and power our bodies. But less than 2 percent of our DNA actually codes for them. The rest — 98.5 percent of DNA sequences — is so-called “junk dna.”
NOUN
GENETICS
- genomic DNA that does not encode proteins, and whose function, if it has one, is not well understood.
So they don’t even fucking understand what 98% of it is or what it does.
But they want to edit it , in every goddamn man woman and child on earth- and especially Americans.
That’s the stupidest fucking idea I’ve ever heard of in my entire life.
It’s all just amino acid chains with fixed molecular weights, and they keep moving molecules around to re patent and protect pharmaceutical monopolies.
“Oh let’s just add a flouride ring here and see what it does.”
Things break.
Or they pull Zantac (or is it Zyrtec, whatever) off the market because (like NAC or carbon , or possibly graphite – disputed -) it gobbles up free radicals – and nobody wants that!
“HIV” – its opening start codon and exon – the “GAG” sequence and triggers a p24 “positive” Elisa result , is nothing more than the scaffolding for a cell. It commonly appears in what you call “DNA. repair” (chromosomes are real, every cell in your body is created from a copy of your chromosomes) but the rest of it is bullshit.
If we’re comfortable calling “DNA” 98% junk, how far of a stretch is it to call it 100% junk?
What if I said there’s an explanation that adds up?
edit February 27 2024: I gotchu