Is that \u201cscience\u201d just explains away the parts they don\u2019t understand , as \u201cjunk DNA\u201d \ud83d\ude02\ud83d\ude02\ud83d\ude02<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\nJunk DNA<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Our genetic manual holds the instructions for the proteins that make up and power our bodies. But less than 2 percent of our DNA actually codes for them. The rest \u2014 98.5 percent of DNA sequences <\/strong>\u2014 is so-called \u201cjunk dna.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n
NOUN<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n
GENETICS<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\n
- genomic DNA that does not encode proteins, and whose function, if it has one, is not well understood.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n
So they don\u2019t even fucking understand what 98% of it is or what it does.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
But they want to edit it , in every goddamn man woman and child on earth- and especially Americans.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
That\u2019s the stupidest fucking idea I\u2019ve ever heard of in my entire life.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
It\u2019s all just amino acid chains with fixed molecular weights, and they keep moving molecules around to re patent and protect pharmaceutical monopolies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\u201cOh let\u2019s just add a flouride ring here and see what it does.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Things break.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Or they pull Zantac (or is it Zyrtec, whatever) off the market because (like NAC or carbon , or possibly graphite – disputed -) it gobbles up free radicals – and nobody wants that!<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\u201cHIV\u201d – its opening start codon and exon – the \u201cGAG\u201d sequence and triggers a p24 \u201cpositive\u201d Elisa result , is nothing more than the scaffolding for a cell. It commonly appears in what you call \u201cDNA. repair\u201d (chromosomes are real, every cell in your body is created from a copy of your chromosomes) but the rest of it is bullshit.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
If we\u2019re comfortable calling \u201cDNA\u201d 98% junk, how far of a stretch is it to call it 100% junk?<\/p>\n\n\n\n
What if I said there\u2019s an explanation that adds up?<\/p>\n\n\n\n
edit February 27 2024: I gotchu<\/p>\n\n\n\n