I suspect that pasteurization has resulted in a critical amino acid (taurine) from being bled or bred out of cows. <\/p>\n\n\n\n
There\u2019s about 18mg per 100 g in human breast milk.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
There is 15mg per 100 g in raw goat milk.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
And then there\u2019s presently about 5mg of taurine per 100 g of pasteurized goat milk.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
There is only 1.8mg or less in pasteurized cow milk.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
And yes, Pasteur\u2019s ceramic filters can break amino chains<\/strong>, which I postulate have been misidentified as \u201cvirus\u201d particles since the 1800s – owing to them establishing a preferential bond with the substrate of the filter thereby breaking the amino acid chain. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Amino acids are 0.40nm to 1.2nm , linear amino acid chains are approximately 3.5nm. I want to say that the ceramic filters go down to 1.4 micrometers, and one reason this would be overlooked is the situation – I\u2019ve brought this up repeatedly – where one of the amino acids prefer the porcelain filter to the amino acid chain it\u2019s currently connected to.<\/p>\n\n\n\n It works for the same reason that carbon mats have \u201cantiviral\u201d properties, although that\u2019s not entirely true. What the carbon mat accomplishes is a molecular reduction<\/strong>. Not everything will prefer the porcelain substrate- and when some of the amino acids and\/or chains or partial chains were \u201cfiltered\u201d out they were mistaken for a novel and heretofore undiscovered \u201cviral\u201d pathogen. It was nothing of the sort, it was a reduction of an amino acid chain. The stop codon or the start codon are gone, and you\u2019re left with what they call a \u201cfree radical\u201d (another misnomer, it\u2019s fine, I\u2019ve been using this term for it as well) looking for something to bind to. <\/p>\n\n\n\n NAC and Zantac bind to them, I can\u2019t say \u201cto what effect\u201d – we banned Zantac in 2020 on the grounds it can \u201ccause cancer\u201d and NAC is neither \u201capproved\u201d nor studied (as far as I know) in the US for any specific purpose related to this. Taurine probably accomplishes the same thing. Sudafed does- and that\u2019s why it relieves \u201ccold\u201d symptoms. (As mentioned elsewhere, adderall and other amphetamines do because they\u2019re one molecule off from Sudafed- Pasteur spent a lot of time studying molecules that were left sided and right sided mirrors of one another, and very obviously understood this. But I doubt he understood what amino acid chains are – because nobody<\/strong> did yet.)<\/p>\n\n\n\n The thinking behind \u201cbinding to\u201d a \u201cfree radical\u201d involves giving those stray broken amino acid chains something to bind to, in order to complete themselves and encode\/repair themselves. It doesn\u2019t have to be exactly what it\u2019s looking for, it will take a close enough analog. The Chinese have the same idea .. in principle .. with graphene oxide<\/em>, and I reiterate that I find that problematic. I am under the assumption it is potentially performing another reduction of an already broken chain that might cause more so-called \u201cfree radicals.\u201d<\/em> Which is exactly what they are claiming Zyrtec does <\/strong>– to a detriment, not a benefit.<\/em> <\/p>\n\n\n\n I propose that food treatments that damage amino acid chains are dangerous to put in your body and accumulate in the first place<\/strong>, even if they don\u2019t have valid stop\/start coding instructions. <\/p>\n\n\n\n The 1 in 10000 fluke that they attach to other molecules or chains in the \u201cwrong\u201d order , by means of cellular construction mechanisms that perform substitutions for analogs and deficiencies \u2026 is how you get \u201cviral\u201d pathology or something that doesn\u2019t make sense like \u201c GAG \u201c, which again, in and of itself , is just \u201cscaffolding\u201d for a cell built with this substitution\/ \u201cdna\u201d repair\/correction process, and not inherently pathological by itself. <\/p>\n\n\n\n (Hint: GAG is in the start codon and first exon for \u201chiv\u201d, RNA but if you don\u2019t have a fully intact amino acid chain- exon #2 (pol) exon #3, (env) and a stop codon (nef overlaps the last two) then it\u2019s essentially a \u201cnon infectious\u201d amino chain that may still show up as \u201cviral load\u201d. It\u2019s why .. what did I say; 99 in 100 or so .. (previous post is correct, I\u2019m tired) of the chains never replicate or encode – and aren\u2019t capable of replicating or encoding: They\u2019re incomplete junk wandering around.)<\/p>\n\n\n\n Pasteur had come up with this process 45 years before it was widely adopted and at that time we had not yet discovered amino acids. We found a \u201cfew of them\u201d in asparagus in 1806 , but had not figured out what they were yet – \u201cviruses\u201d were not a \u201cnon living\u201d pathogen, they were a reduced amino acid chain! — and at that point in history we certainly had not figured out what RNA, DNA (1950s), or telomerase (1980s) (and those are paramagnetic<\/strong>!) were just yet. This one sentence stuck with me a couple years before I even knew what any of his meant.. inspired by whatever muse gives me strange thoughts about kaleidoscopes<\/a> and a few other things<\/em>: <\/p>\n\n\n\n \u201cbuilding blocks have ABC\u2019s just like all the nurseries\u2026\u201d then I learned they also have Ts and Gs and all hell broke loose after that.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The maximum selectivity of separation of the surface-modified ceramic NF membrane, defined as the ratio of (1-retention) of two amino acids, between neutral and acidic amino acids on the one hand and basic amino acids on the other is 3.4 [8], while for an organic membrane it ranged between 1 and 1.25, dependent on pH [12]. <\/p>\nSeparation of amino acids by nanofiltration and ultrafiltration membranes, https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/S1383-5866(98)00068-9<\/cite><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n I would think 115 years is enough time for you to breed it out of your cattle, which at this point are filthy beasts that reek of ammonia and piss and need to be pumped full of hormones and antibiotics to be \u201ccommercially viable\u201d anymore. I don\u2019t know if supplementing the cows themselves with taurine would benefit their health or their milk in the short or long term, but they\u2019re deficient.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n No wonder Bill Gates thinks dairy and meat are bad. Again, he\u2019s close but he should really stick to his day job and make windows stop sucking ass.<\/p>\n\n\n\n A study of their amino acid content in milk tells all. And it\u2019s already been done several times.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Supplement with taurine. The amounts of it found in energy drinks and infant formula are negligible. But a dose of 18mg\/100ml should be closer to the one we currently express – although I\u2019m not clear on whether that\u2019s the \u201cdose\u201d nature intended for you. It could have been bred or bled out of our women, like it has been from the cows.<\/p>\n\n\n\n We started pasteurizing milk on September 21st, 1889.<\/p>\n\n\n\n January 1st, 1891: The first U.S. milk processing plant to install pasteurization equipment was the Sheffield Farms Dairy in Bloomfield, New Jersey. September 21st, 1889<\/strong>: Work started on the pasteurization of milk and cream. <\/p>\n\n\n\n September 20th, 1908: The first law to require the pasteurization of milk was passed in Chicago.<\/p>\nOf course it would be chicago. Probably for the \u201cgreater good,\u201d ikr <\/cite><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n Less than 12 years later we had \u201cinfluenza\u201d and \u201cSpanish flu\u201d that sickened 500 million people – at that time 1\/3 of the worlds population – and killed 1\/5 of those. And it just gets worse with every \u201cvariant\u201d , every solar cycle. (weakened ionosphere = subtle mutations in rna from UV and\/or gamma rays , photons etc should == evolution , this has been holding us back from these cycles being beneficial<\/span><\/strong> for over 100 years, how many sand beagles have to die for fucks sake.) <\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n GUESS WHAT ELSE HAPPENED IN 1908<\/p>\n\n\n\n It is an irony<\/a> of medical history that the transformation of polio into an epidemic<\/a> disease occurred only in those industrialized countries in North America<\/a> and Europe<\/a> that had experienced significant improvements in hygiene<\/a> during the 19th and 20th centuries. <\/strong><\/em><\/p>\nhttps:\/\/www.britannica.com\/science\/polio\/Polio-through-history<\/cite><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n JONAS SALK AND PASTEUR – BTFO – BLOWN THE FUCK OUT. <\/p>\n\n\n\n And we just keep digging a hole for ourselves. I postulate that \u201cinfluenza\u201d doesn\u2019t \u201cmutate\u201d or spread across mammals per se. That they have different breast milk characteristics and the dairy cow is the worst of the whole lot. What happens in our bodies is that we make substitutions for deficiencies in amino acid chains.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Sudafed and amphetamines serve as a shortcut for substituting an amino acid deficiency \u2014 your body wants to build cells and it\u2019s missing something -and it fucking loves filling the gap with Sudafed or speed, which is why Sudafed (one molecule away from speed) even \u201cworks\u201d on your \u201ccold\u201d symptoms .<\/p>\n\n\n\n Energy drinks don\u2019t have a health benefit because caffeine hijacks adenosine receptors , where all these amino acids get encoded and do their work inside your brain<\/strong>. that they use have been using adenosine<\/strong> vaccines \u2014 which no longer work \u2014 to hijack your cellular import process proves it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n <\/p>\n\n\n\n <\/p>\n\n\n\n <\/p>\n\n\n\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" I suspect that pasteurization has resulted in a critical amino acid (taurine) from being bled or bred out of cows. There\u2019s about 18mg per 100 g in human breast milk. There is 15mg per 100 g in raw goat milk. And then there\u2019s presently about 5mg of taurine per 100 g of pasteurized goat milk. […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/v4.fadingstar.mx\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10167"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/v4.fadingstar.mx\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/v4.fadingstar.mx\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/v4.fadingstar.mx\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/v4.fadingstar.mx\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=10167"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/v4.fadingstar.mx\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10167\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":16082,"href":"https:\/\/v4.fadingstar.mx\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10167\/revisions\/16082"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/v4.fadingstar.mx\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=10167"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/v4.fadingstar.mx\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=10167"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/v4.fadingstar.mx\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=10167"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
The problem with the broken amino acid chains created by pasteurization isn\u2019t the part of the chain that stays behind in the filter, the problem is the incomplete end(s) of the chain(s) that slip through the filter (and which you consume.)<\/p>\n\n\n\n
<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n